BioTechniques News
Beatrice Bowlby
Original story from the University of Sydney (Australia).
The answer is not yet, but we’re getting closer. Researchers have developed a computational framework to test how closely lab-grown models resemble real human embryos.
University of Sydney (Camperdown, Australia) researchers have developed a powerful new way to test how closely lab-grown biological models resemble real human embryos, finding that while some models perform well, none yet fully capture the complexity of early human development.
Research on embryo models derived from stem cells, known as blastoids, offers scientists a way to study the biological events that underpin fertility, pregnancy success and early human development without relying on donated human embryos.
Models derived from stem cells could help answer questions that have long been difficult to investigate because of technical and ethical constraints. These stem-cell-derived structures are research models, not actual human embryos. Current models cannot develop into a human embryo.
However, just because something looks like an embryo, does that mean it is behaving like one biologically?
Researchers at the University of Sydney have developed a computational framework that helps answer that question. Their study systematically evaluated four leading human blastoid-generation methods and found substantial differences in how faithfully they reproduce the cell types and developmental processes seen in natural human embryos.
The research creates one of the most comprehensive reference maps of early human embryo development and uses it to benchmark the biological accuracy of stem-cell-derived embryo models.
Lead author Associate Professor Pengyi Yang, ARC Future Fellow in the School of Mathematics and Statistics and Unit Head of Computational Systems Biology at the Children’s Medical Research Institute, said the work provides researchers with a more objective way to understand the strengths and limitations of embryo models.
“Human embryo models have enormous potential for studying the earliest days of an embryo’s development, but there has been no consistent way to assess how accurately these reflect real human development,” explained Yang. “Our framework allows researchers to compare these models against a detailed biological reference and determine which cell types and developmental processes are faithfully reproduced, and which are not.”
Cradle Cultures: Growing Stem Cell-Derived Developmental Cell Models in Vitro
How are three stem cell-derived developmental cell models furthering our understanding of post-implantation human embryo development? And why have recent advancements in these human embryo-like models spurred ethical discussion and the need to refine our definition of ‘embryo’?
How they made the map
The team combined and harmonized more than 14,000 single-cell transcriptomes from human embryos spanning key stages of their development. This allowed them to create a reference map of how cells normally differentiate and organize themselves during the days immediately before and after implantation.
They then compared that reference against four widely used blastoid-generation protocols developed by international research groups. Rather than assessing whether the models simply resembled embryos under a microscope, the researchers examined their molecular identities, developmental timing, lineage structure and other biological characteristics.
The results showed that some blastoid models reproduced all three major cell lineages of a natural human blastocyst, or the early embryo, relatively well, while others failed to accurately represent certain cell types or contained large numbers of cells that could not be confidently matched to any known embryonic state. No single model perfectly replicated a natural human blastocyst.
Associate Professor Yang said the findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of embryo models.
“The encouraging finding is that some models capture important aspects of early embryonic development relatively well, although each model has limitations,” he shared. “But our study also shows that current models are not biologically equivalent to real human embryos, and researchers need to be careful about the conclusions they draw from them.”
By providing a standardized benchmark, the researchers hope future models can be improved more rapidly and evaluated more rigorously.
“If we’re going to use these systems to answer important biological questions, we first need to know what they can reliably tell us,” Yang concluded. “Our work provides a roadmap for improving embryo models and ensuring scientific claims remain grounded in what the models can actually support.”
The researchers have made their reference datasets and benchmarking tools publicly available, enabling scientists worldwide to test new embryo models against the same standards.
This article has been republished from the following materials. Material may have been edited for length and house style. For further information, please contact the cited source. Our press release publishing policy can be accessed here.
The post Can we grow accurate biological versions of human embryos? appeared first on BioTechniques.
Powered by WPeMatico